|
BackgroundThe purpose of the evaluation will determine whether quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods are best suited. Generally, if information is needed on what is occurring, quantitative methods (for example, surveys) are more appropriate. If information is needed about why something is happening, then qualitative methods (interviews, focus groups, observations) are better. Thus, the method will determine what types of tools are required for gathering information. The main focus of this section is on instruments used for qualitative evaluations. The summary focuses on three specific instruments: surveys, discussion / focus groups, and interviews. For each of these, uses, considerations, advantages and possible disadvantages are highlighted. SummaryHere is a summary of the instruments that might be used in evaluations of value and impact: Summary of instruments (PDF 91 KB). QuestionnairesA questionnaire is a multi-stage process starting with a clear definition of what is being examined through the interpretation of the data that is collected. Every step requires careful design - the results are only as good as the weakest link in the design process. Questionnaires might be seen as a relatively cheap method of data collection, but they can be exhausting (and therefore expensive) in terms of the time required for their design and the interpretation of their results. Pay considerable attention to potential respondents and to see the questionnaire through their eyes and how they will regard it (for example, with hostility, suspicion, apathy, grudging compliance, as easy or difficult, motivating or boring, straightforward or complex). The objectives
The questions (1)
The questions (2)
Quality testingTo ensure that a questionnaire is clear and understandable, it needs to be tested out on some pilot users (for example, by using a specially convened focus group). Issues arising should be discussed and the questionnaire revised and tested once more if possible. GeneralInclude a covering explanation about the purposes of the questionnaire, how anonymity and confidentiality will be addressed, who is doing the evaluation / research and who will see the results. Remember to thank the target sample / population for their anticipated co-operation. |
Related examples
| Pilot comments"There is a danger students can feel over-surveyed, so this needed to be considered when developing the length and difficulty of the questionnaire." University of East London "The practicalities of arranging the interview was time consuming... the practicalities of accessing a suitable room did lead to restrictions on interviews taking place." University of York |